I have 7 siblings. Growing up in a large family gave me a pretty good idea how families really look like: very social, constantly changing, chaotic and loud. I really doubted that I myself would ever aim for 8 children. Perhaps 3 or 4 children - that's not too many, right?
And having four children is much better than three, otherwise there will be "middle child syndrome". The middle child will always be too young for some benefits and too old for others while always being "old enough" for chores or obligations. I have read that parents tend to praise the first-born and pamper the youngest and forget about that middle child. With 4 children, this wouldn't be such a problem. The children would group into pairs of two oldest and two youngest and no one would feel left out. So it absolutely makes sense that 4 children is the perfect number of children. Right? Well, yes, if I wasn't fond of having hobbies or a night off or anything like that for the next several years.Not having any children was never an option. If nothing else, I would have adopted. Otherwise I would feel like I'm missing something from my life. I guess I could have waited a few years, but the odds of having a healthy pregnancy and a healthy child are greater as a younger parent, so it would have been irresponsible to procrastinate and postpone something that was inevitable anyway. Only having one child is almost like not having children at all. There would be no kids playing in the background. Only one depressed and lonely child who is forced to hang out in the adult world all alone. Having two children is nice, but when one person is away from home, it will be so quiet and empty. That's not at all how I imagined my home of the future.
I have read that four children is "a lot of work" but it's rarely explained what it means. I assumed they mean the effort of getting children fed, washed, etc. My logic had seemed very solid: when kids are a bit older, they don't need to be looked after so closely. I now realize that TIME is the biggest deficit. Even with 2 children it's suddenly so difficult to find free time. So the logic has changed into: when kids are a bit older, I wouldn't have time to look after them because I'm busy with their younger sibling. I wasn't too fond of the involuntary independence I had as a child. It would have been nice if I hadn't been so solely responsible for my life and everyday problems from quite early on. Parental guidance seems like a good idea.
But if I have half as many kids as my parents, then my children would get twice as much attention and time from their parents as I did from mine. Maybe it would be even better if there were only two of them and they got four times as much attention and time.Erkki's opinion matters as well. We had this talk a long time before we got married. I said four, he said two. I said, "compromise: three!", he said, "let's review after the first child." and after the first child he said, "lets review after the second child", and after the second child he said, "lets discuss this another time.".
Now suddenly I was saying "okay, 3 will be enough" and he was still stuck on 2. So now the number is between 2 and 3. If a couple is between 0 and 1, then it's easy to decide what is fair they should have that one child so that their heritage is preserved. Between 1 and 2 they should go for two because most people with that experience say that it sucks to be an only child. Between 2 and 3 it's just preference. Between 3 and 4 is "ah, to hell with it - it's already so chaotic and loud that one more child won't change much.". But that means that even I admit that 3 children means chaos! Maybe that's why I prefer 3: family is supposed to be somewhat chaotic! Besides, it also makes family life dynamic and interesting.I feel that the choice between two and three is mostly up to me because 3 is already the compromise number. If he says "2 kids" and I say "4 kids", it wouldn't be fair for him to wait a few years and add, "2 kids and that's FINAL!". But do I really want a third child? I know it's such trouble to take care of a baby/toddler, I know my life stops for a while and my career suffers. It's more difficult to travel with 3 children and it's more difficult to find a babysitter. It's also more time-consuming to drive them around when they get hobbies and it takes a lot of effort to make sure they have decent clothes. It's just so troublesome to have any children, it really is! My life would be so much easier if I just didn't have to worry about any children ever.
I would also end up sad and lonely, but it would still be an easier life. I know a person who aspires to slack off as much as possible and seeks ways to do that efficiently but most people aspire to be happy. I knew there would be no happiness without children but does it really matter if it's two or if it's three. My genes have been passed on already, why repeat the process?I wouldn't mind being pregnant again. The second pregnancy was quite exhausting but I still felt very comfortable with pregnancy. It felt somehow so positive. You know the instant good will you feel when you hear someone is pregnant? Well, I felt that about myself, which seems weird in hindsight. It would be sad if that was my last time to ever be pregnant. Giving birth is a different story. I wouldn't want to repeat that. The early baby time was really nice with Liisa. She really made it easy. She is very easy to calm down and she's just amazing. Siiri was an easy baby and Liisa was three times easier! She sleeps well, eats fast, has a good appetite, is active and totally adorable.
But I lost a year. Completely lost it and I can't ever get it back. I barely see my friends, I'm constantly busy with children and their food and playtime, their safety and their outdoor time. It is nice that I'm usually the first person to see their development but I don't develop at all. I'm risking mental retardation here.
I have stopped thinking about how it might look and I just go with the flow. I baby-talk with my children and it doesn't even feel unnatural anymore. Okay, to be honest, my kind of baby-talk still follows certain rules. I use real words and I simplify things a little, but I explain the world like it is. Siiri likes it when I explain bacteria to her and I'm already starting to use key phrases when talking with Liisa. But I still usually talk in such a way that even a (very smart) 3-year old could understand me and it's increasingly difficult to switch over to adult conversation. It will pass when children grow older but would I really want to go back to square one with another baby?Due to my education and career plans, another baby couldn't possibly be planned sooner than 4-5 years from now. For some people it seems like a perfect pause between two children but to me it seems horribly wasteful. In 4-5 years I will have finally got my life back and I can go to the movies, conferences, restaurants, tropical islands... And then I ruin it all with another baby whose world breaks apart when I walk to another room. But then again, I have several female friends who are currently either single or simply don't have children yet. Maybe they'll have children in a few years and then having kids will be the social thing to do. Besides, I'll have more opportunity to pay attention to the third child when older children are a bit older and no one will feel left out. But I won't be able to travel for years and I will have to spend a lot of time at home.
And just to make it clear, with each child I lose years of my life. Not only because of the time dedicated to only them, but also the time when I'm so stretched thin with all the toddler care topics in my "free time" that I barely get to concentrate at work. I miss the freedom to stay in the laboratory until late evening.
I won't have that for years to come. Having a family is such a disadvantage in science.In every logical way, it makes sense to stop at two. We'd have more time, money, easier life, I'd have a better career, we can buy nicer cars, stay at better hotels, travel to nicer places and the list goes on and on. There is no reason to have a third child, especially after several years of pause when the girls are already becoming quite independent. So why can't I really picture a future with only two children. Why do I keep making excuses to fit another child into my life. To be fair, I can't picture it with three children either because I keep imagining all the things I've lost because of that one choice. Not being able to make up my mind is really stressing me out. I won't have the answer until 4-5 years from now. Of course I know that nature and health can't be planned, so any plans might be changed at the last minute. I'm leaning towards three. Feel free to comment and discuss whether it's better to have more children or less.
Amazing physical development! There's usually a balance between physical and mental development: baby is either talking or walking early. I'm not too worried about her being early in physical development and late with her mental development because at 7 months old, she started saying "mommy" (emme). She hasn't quite decided what it means: mother or milk or "something good", but she definitely says it deliberately and sometimes repeats it after me. 
- but Siiri falls asleep quite easily and lately hasn't had many night terrors.
She's a really low-maintenance baby when she's with me, but she sometimes gives other people a hard time. She's very attached to me and it will be difficult for me to go back to school in September.
That has to count for something.
Liisa eats quite well and she drinks water very well, which is very useful. Making purees takes a lot of time but it's good not to depend on jars of puree that I can't even pick out myself (because usually Erkki goes to the grocery store).
= two boys sparring?)
I'm trying not to over-think it and I shouldn't have to worry that much because this time I picked the school much more carefully. I have only had one theory lesson so far and most of the time I was trying not to think about actually driving because otherwise my heart skipped a beat. I'm pretty sure that when I'm actually driving, my body will have to find a way to get over the fear, otherwise my head would explode. Faced with a choice between relaxing and my head exploding, my brain will probably choose the first option.
Most people love roller coasters for the same reason, and for me it takes much less stimulus to become very shaken. Giving a university lecture was truly scary, to be honest, but I never seriously considered declining the opportunity. Most of the time it's exhausting to be shaken very easily and to have so much adrenaline, but I wouldn't want it to keep me from living a full life. Perhaps that's why I often do things that I find really scary*. I find driving REALLY scary and I'm going back without anyone forcing my hand. I mean scary in the sense that even thinking about it threatens to give me a slight headache. Perhaps the sane thing to do would be to never drive again, but sanity is over-rated. Being able to achieve something that seems impossible when you start has much more value for me.
Nasty horrible icky eight-legged monsters.
I do go out with them when the weather is nice. All that "fresh air" (urban slang for pollution, dust and allergens) is great for children - prepares their immune system for life. Even going to a grocery store is like an event. It's usually not worth the effort to go to the store myself so I regularly just tell Erkki what I need. It's also not worth the stress to go to a restaurant with two small kids so I look up recipes to get some variety. Erkki has managed to make the perfect steak for us recently. As we found out, all the cooking websites that discuss it, say that a well done steak is inedible and a complete waste of perfectly good meat. We put it to the test and left the meat much more pink and it was incredible! Absolutely deliciously amazing, dark pink, almost red on the inside. I hadn't had a decent steak in a restaurant so it was the best steak in my life. But I was talking about not going out so often anymore. Erkki told me that restaurants in Tartu don't offer steak that good and I totally believe him. So I don't mind staying in. I feel comfortable here and I'm definitely too busy to get bored.
I said, " No, people don't have wings. Angels and faeries look like people, but they have wings. They can fly. People don't have wings. But can people fly?". Siiri said, "Yes, we can!". I said, "No, people can't really fly without a plane, or a helicopter, at least not outside the dreams. See that sewing machine on a really high shelf, barely below the ceiling. If I wanted to reach it, could I fly there?". She said, "Yes!". I said, "No, I would have to get a chair and climb higher to reach it." She said, "Mommy will get a chair and Siiri will climb higher and higher and higher (pointing at her planned route) and I will reach and get the sewing machine." Although I never brought her the chair and even I couldn't climb there like that, it was very clear that she was convinced that she could. I said, "It's too high. You'd need a stairway to get up there.". She said (while gesticulating and pointing), "Lets go to the playground and lets get the stairs off of the slide and then put the stairs here and then I can climb up-up-up and then get the sewing machine!". Nice plan!
There are greedy and evil people among people of all social backgrounds but people with very limited resources can do less harm. For example, I feel very uncomfortable with banks making ridiculous amounts of profit while poverty becomes more and more widespread. Some of that money should have been invested back in the society. I also hate monopoly and how it influences prices. Similar to monopoly, I hate it when all the biggest companies make an agreement to sell some product type for an outrageous price. It basically what Hollywood movie companies have done. They have decided that it costs about $10 to see a movie and about $20-$30 to own a copy. It's way too much, considering the low level of quality they offer. And now people have no say in this. Sure we can watch an indie movie in stead... Wait a minute, those cost about as much money. How about local movies? Those cost EVEN MORE! I haven't seen any Estonian movies from the last 10 years because I'm not willing to pay $30 for an obscure low-budget movie.
The few times I've seen new Estonian films being sold in the movie store, they cost at least as much as the newest most expensive multi-million dollar Hollywood movies.
... Oh wait. It IS possible. Just some people never bothered to do it. At least not here.
There is no legal way to see most movies. Hollywood knows that old movies aren't really worth much so there's not much profit in selling them. Thus the only option for people to see old movies is to download them illegally. I have no problem with piracy as such. (OH MY GOD, Lock up the door, Lawyers are coming to get me!!!)
And then goes insane and starts going around burning down book stores that might still have a copy of his book.
I actually found the mysteriously hidden stuffed toy! It was well hidden in Siiri's room, in a cupboard where we keep leftover diapers. I had looked there, but obviously not well enough. Siiri was overjoyed, as was I. Several days later she still sometimes happily announces, "Mommy found Mickey!". It's her favorite toy again and she often sleeps with Mickey by her side.
), and shush Siiri when she does or says anything that would make her less sleepy. Really, counting sheep or even just counting numbers doesn't help anyone fall asleep if they count out loud!
I don't have any problems with her crying or breastfeeding. She is doing well and she's really cute. She has now learned to stretch her toes to her mouth and her socks are often damp from being chewed on. She's showing signs of teething, but no teeth are visible and she it doesn't wake her up at night. She had two vaccine shots a couple of days ago and now has a slight fever. Once it's gone down, I'll start with solids. Then Siiri will have a problem: she's afraid of noisy machines. Over all, life is good.
She crawls backwards and doesn't quite realize she's doing it but she moved half a meter or even more in minutes. That means I have to be careful with letting her sleep in the large bed while I'm not there to notice her wake up and crawl towards the edge. Liisa is a delightful baby. She's very cheerful and smiles a lot. She lights up whenever Siiri pays attention to her and she loves seeing Erkki after a long workday. It's odd - I didn't think she would perceive the time Erkki is away but she is especially happy to see Erkki when she hasn't seen him all day. I'm not jealous of the smiles Siiri and Erkki get because Liisa is the cutest when we're alone. She tells me long stories (gooo-gaaaaaaa..brrrrr...ghhhhh) and I repeat what she says and she is so happy that we're communicating. I don't remember if I used as much baby-talk with Siiri. I know I sometimes mirrored her sounds because she always had a positive reaction to it, but I think I enjoy it even more with Liisa. With Siiri I felt silly making odd sounds and I was afraid it would lead to me being a silly baby-talking mother. ("awww looky at cuuute doggy woof"
). There will be a time when we forbid dumb baby-talk around Liisa as well, but it will be months before she actually starts learning words so I can baby-talk all I want.
I tried to intuitively find a third solutions and I did: when I lie next to Liisa, she is very vivacious and playful and tries to engage me in a conversation... and then falls asleep. I don't know how it works because she doesn't seem to get any sleepier but right now it seems like a good solution. I get to browse the Internet on my HTC Desire while I wait for Liisa to suddenly magically fall asleep.
I can't help but think that her fondness for numbers and geometrical shapes will lead to good mathematical skills. She just really loves numbers. If she ever gets an imaginative friend, it will probably be "three".
Lately I expect her to fall asleep in 30-90 minutes. It sometimes takes longer but overall we have so much more time during the day, she's better rested, wakes up less during the night and is more enjoyable to be around. I'm supposed to be better rested as well, but both me and Erkki have been really sleepy lately. It's a comfortable kind of sleepiness. Lately all soft surfaces just seem so much softer and exercising feels like too much effort.
Then she spends 10 minutes talking and playing with her stuffed toys.
I treat this as "at least she's in bed", but then she gets bored with that and walks out again. And that goes on for a couple of hours until I get irritated and short-tempered and whenever she even makes a beep, I don't even bother going to her, but I just yell from another room, "Siiri, back to bed, right now!". And then eventually she is so sleepy that she just crashes in her bed, because that's where she happens to be.
When it's sleeping time, we don't play or eat. I don't teach her anything, she doesn't practice drawing or play with Play-Doh. It's pointless wasted time. It's my life (or Erkki's) and Siiri's just ticking away completely uselessly. I don't get to concentrate on anything because every 5-10 minutes I get to order Siiri back to bed. (I guess now you see the potential usefulness of getting a lock for her door, except there's no bathroom there.). When I'm in the other room putting Liisa to sleep, Siiri takes advantage of the situation and wanders around and then starts playing with the volume of her voice: shrieking softer and louder. When I was cutting Liisa's hair while Liisa was asleep, Siiri came out and casually woke up Liisa with pointless talk. That was one time I was really pissed off and didn't want to talk with Siiri for a couple of hours. I totally see the enjoyment I would get from physical punishment. I really have a cruel streak in me.
Some parts of my childhood have taught me to be cruel because to me it seemed that everyone else is cruel too. That's not completely true but I do still have to work on my temper. Physical punishment would be a bitter sweet revenge for not going to sleep at the right time: but that sounds way too mean for any good parent, so I won't do that.
Brillint idea, eh? So when I read her the fairy tales and say good night, I can add, "and don't you dare getting out of bed, or I will hide all your toys and you won't see them until you wake up. And if you get out of bed again, I start throwing them out the window. One. By. One." Or I could take a devil's mask that I could buy in some carnival store and put it on and not take it off until after she falls asleep, so that she could be too scared to come out of her room, and while I wear it I could be really mean and angry. Or I could do it easier and "accidentally" start watching horror movies after her bedtime, so that when she wanders out of her room, she happens to see them and won't ever dare to come out of her room at bedtime ever again. (Except when she starts having nightmares and runs out of her room screaming...
) I don't know. All of it sounds like a good idea at the moment. Anything sounds better than 5 and a half hours (yes, that's how long it finally took) wasted during an otherwise perfect Sunday. Half of that time Erkki was the active party, the other half I was the active party, not none of that time we could spend together, just watching something together or having a meaningful conversation. Today Liisa was in a foul mood as well, so even browsing the net was not easy. I didn't find any useful information how to improve nap times. It seems like we've already tried everything.
", you might wonder. Sure you don't get a physical disc or a manual, but that affects the price very little and who needs those anyway. What's wrong is that you buy the game only after you sign a contract that the games will only be for PERSONAL use. That does not include a wife and a couple of kids. If you let your wife/husband play with your account, you're actually breaking the agreement.
I don't know how that is even possible because such user agreements just can't be above marital law. What's mine is Erkki's and vice versa. Sure, it doesn't apply to all things, for example I have no right to modify or delete Erkki's Facebook account or to even view his e-mail accounts but the games he buys on Steam are just as much bought with my money. If it's really possible to sign an agreement that makes those games belong to only him, then why do people even bother signing prenuptial agreement before they get married. One of the partners could just sign separate agreements so that all the best things he buys only belong to him/her.
That means Steam sows as much morally bad Internet behavior as the overpriced game industry in general. Or in other words, they re-define what to consider immoral: is it immoral to break a end user agreement? What if it's a stupid and unfair agreement?
Why would they want to play games anyway...

At least that's how it's being taxed by EAS.